- Seiu Local 2015 Los Angeles
- 2015 Los Angeles County Fiscal Manual Pdf
- 2015 Los Angeles County Fiscal Manualidades
California's Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act was designed to provide a stable funding source for juvenile programs that have proven effective in curbing crime among at-risk and young offenders. It provides funds to counties to add evidence-based programs and services for juvenile probationers identified with higher needs for special services than those identified for routine probationers, at-risk youths who have not entered the probation system but who live or attend school in areas of high crime or who have other factors that potentially predispose them to criminal activities, and youths in juvenile halls. The California state legislature requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to submit annual reports evaluating the program on six outcome measures: (1) successful completion of probation, (2) arrests, (3) probation violations, (4) incarcerations, (5) successful completion of restitution, and (6) successful completion of community service.
Each county can also measure supplemental outcomes. The report also compares juvenile justice system costs for program youths in the six months before they entered a program and in the six months after entering the program. Differences in outcomes between program participants and comparison-group youths are relatively small, but they are consistent enough that they appear to be real differences rather than statistical anomalies. County-developed supplemental outcomes tend to be more favorable than state-mandated big six outcomes, although samples tend to be considerably smaller than for big six outcomes.
Key Findings. Nearly All of the Big Six Outcomes Measured Either Improved or Remained the Same.
Participants in the Enhanced Mental Health Services initiative had significantly fewer incarcerations than comparison-group youths. Participants in the Enhanced School- and Community-Based Services initiative had significantly more-positive outcomes than the baseline period or comparison group for arrest rate, completion of probation, and completion of community service. Those in Enhanced Services to High-Risk/High-Need Youths had a significantly lower rate of probation completion than last year's participants. No other big six outcomes showed any statistically significant change. All of the Supplemental Outcomes Measured Either Improved or Remained the Same. Participants in Multisystemic Therapy significantly improved in school attendance.
Self-efficacy scores improved significantly for Gender-Specific Community youths between program entry and six months later, or upon exit from the program, whichever came first. Among High Risk/High Need participants, measures of family relations also improved significantly in the six months between program entry and exit. For the programs that used educational measures as supplemental outcomes, school attendance improved significantly in the term following program entry compared with the previous term. School suspensions and expulsions also dropped, although the differences were not always statistically significant. Among participants in the school-based programs, test scores were significantly higher for strengths and significantly lower for risks and barriers in the six months following program entry than at program entry.
Abolish Chronic Truancy and Inside-Out Writers showed significant improvements in supplemental outcomes as well. The research described in this report was conducted by the within. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors.
All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law.
![Fiscal Fiscal](/uploads/1/2/4/1/124197206/433688604.png)
For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the page. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis.
RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) supports the City's workforce development activities provided through its Workforce Development System, comprised of WorkSource and YouthSource Centers, and the HIRE LA's Youth Initiative. This effort is impactful having served over 755,000 Angelenos within the past five years. The Annual Plans cover the service strategies, activities and budget for the City's Workforce Development System. They outline how the City will deliver services and meet the objectives of promoting a trained workforce with access to good jobs and a strong business/employer regional economy.
May 2013 In spite of slow economic recovery, the City's Workforce Development System assisted over 177,000 jobseekers, laid off workers, youth and employers during 2011-2012. July 2011 During Program Year 2010-11, the WIB Workforce Development System assisted over 200,000 job seekers in their search for employment and training. July 2010 This report showcases the Workforce Investment Board's many extraordinary services dedicated to the improvement of the Los Angeles workforce and economy Los Angeles Basin Regional Planning Unit - Regional Workforce Development Plan 2017-2020.
California State University Northridge has a providing free, open access to scholarly work and reports for the larger workforce, researchers and community. Below are a list of reports related to Los Angeles workforce, the WorkSource System and the local economy. Adult Education in Los Angeles. Workforce Investment Board Article - July 2013. Los Angeles Workforce Systems Collaborative Report - Fall 2012 California's Forgotten Middle-Skill Jobs- Meeting the Demands of a 21st Century Economy. 'The Next Decade: Industries and Occupations for the Los Angeles Workforce' Commissioned by the WIB and produced by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC), the report identifies regional industries that are promising to target for job retention and expansion efforts and investment in sector training programs.
The report provides an economic overview of Los Angeles County, the City of Los Angeles, and an employment forecast for the next decade. The report also identifies the industries which are expected to grow and provide job opportunities for Los Angelenos. and January 2011 Evaluation of L.A.’s HOPE. Funded by the State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Re-Entry Employment Options Project (REEOP) provides support and services related to job creation, training, and job placement efforts for men and women who leave prison with no direct access to specialized programs in the City and County of Los Angeles. June 2009 Federal Budget. October 7, 2011 A progress briefing by WIB Executive Director Gregg Irish.
September 2011 House Appropriations Committee spreadsheet on proposed program cuts for fiscal year 2012 Los Angeles City Council. A new study on high school dropouts in Los Angeles raises the specter of a lifetime existence at the poverty level. In his newly released report, Professor Paul Harrington, noted economist and director of the Center for Labor Market Studies - Northeastern University, Boston, illuminates the extent to which the economic effects to dropouts are disastrous in terms of lowering the likelihood of employment, lowering wages and lifetime earnings, and increasing the risk of falling into poverty.
Arctic cat atv service manual 2017. The report, commissioned by the City of Los Angeles’ workforce policy leaders, which is the Workforce Investment Board (WIB), along with the WIB Youth Council, and the Community Development Department (CDD) reports some sobering statistics. November 2009 Work, School, and Idleness. November 2009 Consequences of Dropping Out. October 2009 One Out of Five.
California's Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act was designed to provide a stable funding source for juvenile programs that have proven effective in curbing crime among at-risk and young offenders. It provides funds to counties to add evidence-based programs and services for juvenile probationers identified with higher needs for special services than needs identified for routine probationers, at-risk youths who have not entered the probation system but who live or attend school in areas of high crime or who have other factors that potentially predispose them to criminal activities, and youths in juvenile halls. The California state legislature requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to submit annual reports evaluating the program on six outcome measures: (1) successful completion of probation, (2) arrests, (3) probation violations, (4) incarcerations, (5) successful completion of restitution, and (6) successful completion of community service.
Seiu Local 2015 Los Angeles
Each county can also measure supplemental outcomes. The report also compares juvenile justice system costs for program youths in the six months before they entered a program and in the six months after entering the program.
Differences in outcomes between program participants and comparison-group youths are relatively small, but they are consistent enough that they appear to be real differences rather than statistical anomalies. County-developed supplemental outcomes tend to be more favorable than state-mandated big six outcomes, although samples tend to be considerably smaller than for big six outcomes. Key Findings.
Treatment and comparison groups differed significantly on state-mandated outcomes. Participants in the Enhanced Mental Health Services initiative had significantly higher rates of completion of community service. Participants in the Enhanced Services to High-Risk/High-Need Youths initiative did at least as well as the previous year's cohort in five of the big six outcomes and exceeded expectations for rates of arrest. Participants in the Enhanced School- and Community-Based Services initiative had significantly more-positive outcomes than the comparison-group youths in five of the big six outcome measures. For the programs that used educational measures as supplemental outcomes, school attendance improved significantly in the term following program entry. School suspensions and expulsions also dropped, although the differences were not always statistically significant. Among participants in the school-based programs, test scores were significantly higher for strengths and significantly lower for risks and barriers, except for strengths in the very small School-Based Probation Supervision for Middle School Probationers program.
2015 Los Angeles County Fiscal Manual Pdf
Abolish Chronic Truancy and Inside-Out Writers showed significant improvements in supplemental outcomes as well. Treatment and comparison groups differed significantly on county-mandated outcomes, but samples were small enough to warrant caution in interpretation. Supplemental outcomes in the Enhanced Mental Health Services initiative showed significant differences in Brief Symptom Inventory scores for youths in the Mental Health Screening, Assessment, and Treatment program and in school attendance for Multisystemic Therapy participants. In the Enhanced Services to High-Risk/High-Need Youths initiative, self-efficacy scores improved significantly for Gender-Specific Community youths. Among High Risk/High Need participants, measures of family relations also improved significantly.
The research described in this report was conducted by the within. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited.
2015 Los Angeles County Fiscal Manualidades
RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.